From 2516481827880554a2bed12ead0633355c3caf2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: TRaSH Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 09:27:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [Guide] Fixed typo --- docs/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md | 2 +- docs/Sonarr/Sonarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md b/docs/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md index 89f9e8511..8c81003d2 100644 --- a/docs/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md +++ b/docs/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ For Jellyfin/Emby: ## Original Title vs Original Filename -Another option is to use `{Original Title}` rather than the recommeneded naming scheme outlined above. `{Original Title}` will use the title of the release which will contain all of the information included in the release itself. The benefit of this naming scheme is to prevent download loops which can occur on import when there is a discrepancy in the release title compared to the contents of the file itself (for example, if the release title says DTS-ES but the contents are actually DTS). The downside is less flexibility with how the files are named. +Another option is to use `{Original Title}` rather than the recommended naming scheme outlined above. `{Original Title}` will use the title of the release which will contain all of the information included in the release itself. The benefit of this naming scheme is to prevent download loops which can occur on import when there is a discrepancy in the release title compared to the contents of the file itself (for example, if the release title says DTS-ES but the contents are actually DTS). The downside is less flexibility with how the files are named. If using this alternate naming scheme I suggest using `{Original Title}` over `{Original Filename}` diff --git a/docs/Sonarr/Sonarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md b/docs/Sonarr/Sonarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md index 2af53ec75..9d8b40535 100644 --- a/docs/Sonarr/Sonarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md +++ b/docs/Sonarr/Sonarr-recommended-naming-scheme.md @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ RESULTS: ## Original Title vs Original Filename -Another option is to use `{Original Title}` rather than the recommeneded naming scheme outlined above. `{Original Title}` will use the title of the release which will contain all of the information included in the release itself. The benefit of this naming scheme is to prevent download loops which can occur on import when there is a discrepancy in the release title compared to the contents of the file itself (for example, if the release title says DTS-ES but the contents are actually DTS). The downside is less flexibility with how the files are named. +Another option is to use `{Original Title}` rather than the recommended naming scheme outlined above. `{Original Title}` will use the title of the release which will contain all of the information included in the release itself. The benefit of this naming scheme is to prevent download loops which can occur on import when there is a discrepancy in the release title compared to the contents of the file itself (for example, if the release title says DTS-ES but the contents are actually DTS). The downside is less flexibility with how the files are named. If using this alternate naming scheme I suggest using `{Original Title}` over `{Original Filename}`