From 5364c23da3bf2d972f0f63ac302de58ed83b72e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: TRaSH Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 16:39:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Updated: Trying to make the 265 more clear Updated: Trying to make the 265 more clear --- Misc/x265-4k.md | 2 +- SonarrV3/Sonarr-Release-Profile-RegEx.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Misc/x265-4k.md b/Misc/x265-4k.md index 5070b8937..3f8ee84b4 100644 --- a/Misc/x265-4k.md +++ b/Misc/x265-4k.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Then the question why I put `/(x|h)\.?265/i` as `Must Not Contain`. Luckily someone else on Discord described it nice and correctly in my opinion. ``` -x265 is good for 4k remuxes. +x265 is good for for 4k stuff or 1080p if they used the the remuxes as source. If the media isn't source quality/remux, then there will be a loss of quality every time. Also, once you go x265, typically that file is done. It can't be changed to something else without a huge loss of quality. diff --git a/SonarrV3/Sonarr-Release-Profile-RegEx.md b/SonarrV3/Sonarr-Release-Profile-RegEx.md index 19af1424f..8bf061af4 100644 --- a/SonarrV3/Sonarr-Release-Profile-RegEx.md +++ b/SonarrV3/Sonarr-Release-Profile-RegEx.md @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ Then the question why I put `/(x|h)\.?265/i` as `Must Not Contain`. Luckily someone else on Discord described it nice and correctly in my opinion. ``` -x265 is good for 4k remuxes. +x265 is good for for 4k stuff or 1080p if they used the the remuxes as source. If the media isn't source quality/remux, then there will be a loss of quality every time. Also, once you go x265, typically that file is done. It can't be changed to something else without a huge loss of quality.