From e98311b2daf7b53441778b2a4df95cd78acdf6c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: <> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 21:07:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Deployed 4ab79431 with MkDocs version: 1.4.2 --- .../index.html | 27 ++++++++++-- .../index.html | 12 +++--- .../index.html | 12 +++--- .../radarr-setup-quality-profiles/index.html | 40 ++++++++++++------ SQP/1/index.html | 16 +++---- SQP/2/index.html | 6 +-- SQP/3/index.html | 6 +-- SQP/4/index.html | 6 +-- SQP/5/index.html | 6 +-- .../index.html | 23 +++++++++- .../index.html | 6 +-- .../index.html | 6 +-- .../sonarr-setup-quality-profiles/index.html | 34 +++++++++++---- search/search_index.json | 2 +- sitemap.xml.gz | Bin 1093 -> 1093 bytes updates.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++ 16 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) diff --git a/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme/index.html b/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme/index.html index e6379b3a9..eac50e420 100644 --- a/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme/index.html +++ b/Radarr/Radarr-recommended-naming-scheme/index.html @@ -259,6 +259,15 @@ Original Title vs Original Filename +
On the Radarr Discord people often ask, "What's the recommended/best way to +
On the Radarr Discord people often ask, "What's the recommended/best way to name your files?" First off, it's personal preference, but it's often recommended to add non-recoverable info.
Why?
If, for what ever reason, you ever need to do a re-install or re-import in @@ -1077,7 +1095,8 @@ it gets imported correctly and isn't incorrectly matched as HDTV or WEB-DL etc.<
Another option is to use {Original Title}
rather than the recommeneded naming scheme outlined above. {Original Title}
will use the title of the release which will contain all of the information included in the release itself. The benefit of this naming scheme is to prevent download loops which can occur on import when there is a discrepancy in the release title compared to the contents of the file itself (for example, if the release title says DTS-ES but the contents are actually DTS). The downside is less flexibility with how the files are named.
Another option is to use {Original Title}
rather than the recommended naming scheme outlined above. {Original Title}
will use the title of the release which will contain all of the information included in the release itself. The benefit of this naming scheme is to prevent download loops which can occur on import when there is a discrepancy in the release title compared to the contents of the file itself (for example, if the release title says DTS-ES but the contents are actually DTS). The downside is less flexibility with how the files are named.
If using this alternate naming scheme I suggest using {Original Title}
over {Original Filename}
Why?
The filename can be Obscured where the Release naming isn't, especially when you use Usenet.
@@ -1086,7 +1105,7 @@ it gets imported correctly and isn't incorrectly matched as HDTV or WEB-DL etc.<** Please note that folder names are created (in the database) whenever the movie is added to Radarr, and it may be missing or incorrect at that time and your folder would have a blank ID!!!**
+Please note that folder names are created (in the database) whenever the movie is added to Radarr, and it may be missing or incorrect at that time and your folder would have a blank ID!!!
If you instead add it in the filename, the IMDb ID will be freshly pulled for any download or upgrade.
Another potential negative of using it in the folder is that folder renames are complex, lengthy, and potentially destructive in Radarr compared to file renames.
Dolby Vision is available in several profiles
+